"Art or Propaganda?" - a comparison between Alain Locke and W.E.B.Dubois

1. Introduction. W.E.B. Dubois and Alain Locke were important contri exactlyors to the epoch called Harlem Renaissance. With their writings atrists unavoidablenessed to do something against racism, they valued to try bulge out that the African - Americans dont accept to feel inferior. Writing in the April, 1915, issue of Crisis, DuBois said: In art and literature we should show to loose the tremendous emotional wealth of the lightlessness and the dramatic strength of his problems through writing ... and other forms of art. We should resurrect forget ancient Negro art and history, and we should set the black man before the world as both a fruitful artist and a strong subject for artistic treatment. DuBois verbalise what were to be recurrent themes of the decade of the twenties: the Negro as a producer and a subject of art, and the Negros artistic out stave as indices of his contribution to American life. (Linnemann R.J. p 79) In essense, both Locke and DuBois hold a bout what constituted good art. It was the officiate of art on which they did not agree. DuBois doubted if one could really have a disembarrass art or beauty; but Locke was not pursuit for the Negro carry throughr a free beauty. (Linnemann, R.J.

p 92) DuBois power plentifuly disagreed with Lockes view that Beauty rather than Propaganda should be the object of Negro literature and art. ...If Mr. Lockes thesis is insisted upon too ofttimes is going to turn the Negro Renaissance into decadence. (Marable, M.. p 130) beginning I will contact some basical facts about the Harlem Renaissance. In the main part I will show the opinions of A. Locke, who preferred arts, and W.E.B. DuBois, who was for propaganda. In point ternary I will! write about DuBoiss life. After that I will show what he wanted in general. The... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay